I wanted to revisit this topic as it seemed timely as I head into the final tryout for a program that I am a part of called Centre for/de Performance (or CP as everyone in Canada fondly references it).
CP is a nationally run program directed by Canada Basketball and delivered by the provinces. Its mandate is essentially to identify and develop athletes – between the ages of 12 and 17 – with national team potential.
Now, we can (and should… I welcome it) discuss this topic going in a lot of different tangents, but I wanted to touch on the identification process; specifically, around athleticism. I grazed over this one in an earlier post called Perceptions… Is Your First Your Last. But as I was compiling my notes for the coaching team for this weekend, on what characteristics to assess in the selection process, Brian McCormick’s newsletter popped into my inbox, triggering my desire to write this post.
What excited me was the list I began compiling on athleticism as I was returning from Spain shows some parallel thinking to what McCormick wrote.
Let me also preface everything below by saying that I would not call myself a master in sport science. My Human Kinetics classmates in university will attest to that. But, I did pay attention, somewhat, in Dr.’s Keno, Kimmerle, Weir and Moreno’s classes. (A mouthful, I know. But I had to drop their names because this is probably the only context where I’ll be able to give them thanks again!)
Getting back to my point…
The CP identification process is geared toward targeting young athletes with athleticism and height. At least, that’s how I have tended to framed it over the years. Once ID’d, we train for skill and complement their ‘athletic’ base with the expertise of many sport scientists.
That said, with limited resources to provide to network ID’ing coaches, it’s still a bit of a “Get ‘em to me tall, mobile with broad, square shoulders… and, I’ll do the rest!” type of mentality.
Not good enough.
THERE’S MORE THAN ONE TYPE OF “ATHLETE”
The word “athlete” is a bit of an abstraction. It means different things to different people—even within the same sport.
For many, athleticism thought of as the person who can out run, out jump, out ‘do’ their opponent. Yet, even in this train of thought, there are different types of athletes. For example, leapers versus jumpers.
When I grew up, a leaper was the one-foot-take-off athlete who would fly. Think, Dr. J. Rarely do I remember him taking off on two feet when laying up the ball. For this type of athlete, leaping distance is their claim to fame.
You had ballers we use to call jumpers. These were the two-foot dunkers. That had, “hops” as it’s said today. Remember, The Human Highlight Reel, Dominique Wilkins? Or, Baby Jordan, Harold Minor? Always off two. They had “vert”.
I’m sure others have their own tags for what I’m talking about. Nevertheless, hopefully you get my drift.
You see, I’ve been continually reminded in my travels and study tours that athleticism comes in different – for a lack of a better word – forms.
Yes… general physical qualities and morphology (i.e. ‘straight-ahead’ speed, height, body composition, etc.) are factors. Length, size and speed will continue to be positive predispositions. But, they are not the end-all. With that in mind, it becomes important to define this term, athleticism, so that those golden nugget athletes don’t get missed.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF ATHLETICISM
- Catching (i.e. soft hands) & Throwing (not technical skills, but using rotational strength)
- Hand-Eye Coordination / Reaction Time
VISUAL ACUITY (ability to switch from a broad or soft-centered focus to a narrow, fine-centered… as McCormick calls it)
- Vision & Scanning
- Peripheral Vision
- Anticipation and “mental mapping” when outside of vision range (…this could reflect more tactical awareness though; gotta give it more thought)
- Balance / Landing
- Body Control & Coordination
- Acceleration / Deceleration (Stopping & Starting Skills)
- Ground Reaction Time (Footwork Speed)
- Agility & Lateral Quickness
- Economy of Movement & Court Coverage
- Dynamic Flexibility
- [Something I'm calling] “transference” … i.e. to go from a jump to a sprint to a slide; to me involved a dynamic transfer of movements within various random sequences and in different planes (okay… that as technical as I can get. Hope you’re still with me.)
ANAEROBIC & AEROBIC CAPACITY
- Recovery & Power (exertion)
- Motivation… Passion… Aggressiveness… Fighting spirit… Competitiveness
- Focus (i.e. ability to shift from broad-narrow, internal-external, past-present-future)
- Self Driven… Willingness to Train
- Resiliency (which is far more important that confidence)
- Decision Making, Reads & Reaction
Some of you may argue that some of these are not indicators of athleticism. I beg to differ. I’ll concede that most cannot be taken isolation, but each reflects on an individual’s athletic capacity or threshold for world class performance.
Brian McCormick says this in his “Hard To Guard Player Development newsletter” (Issue #37):
The problem, for players and coaches, is failing to identify other athletic attributes. A coach may cut a player who lacks straight-ahead speed or jumping ability because he is “unathletic.” However, what if the player has the skills to be the next Steve Nash? Nash is often described as unathletic because he does not dunk. However, he is incredibly athletic. His hand-eye coordination is as good as it gets in the NBA; his reaction time is unbelievable; his lateral movement is excellent; his ability to switch from a broad or soft-centered focus to a narrow, fine-centered focus is the best in the NBA; his body awareness is exceptional; his dexterity with both hands is tops in the NBA; his first step quickness is far above average for the NBA; his core strength is unparalleled in the NBA. In all these categories, he is in the top 1% of NBA players, but because he does not “look” athletic (sculpted muscles) or do obviously athletic things (dunk), the popular media characterizes him as unathletic.
I’ve watched Nash training during national team practices and spoken to several who helped in his development – both pre-NBA and during. Doubt you’d find many to challenge McCormick’s statement above about Nash.
All in, my list – which is still a work in progress – is pretty long, I admit. It takes time to develop the “eye of the expert” to be able to discern all these areas when assessing potential. We’ve got to begin somewhere, so hopefully the list above begins to generate some thoughts.
Beyond that, we must be sure not settle on vague, non-descript and layperson descriptions of athleticism. Athleticism is not a two-headed beast. So, when describing it, go beyond the fan mentality which rests its case predominantly on the platform of faster-higher. That’s a start, but far from then end. The other categories of athleticism are just as, if not, long-term, of greater importance to an athlete’s ability to execute sport-specific technical and tactical (multi-player and strategic) skills.
You see, when you combine speed and jumping with multiples of the other categories, you have synergy. It creates the possibility of exponential growth in an athlete’s development. In other words, the more categories of the other athletic qualities you can find, means a larger threshold for improvement and productivity, long term. That’s potential.
The next step is harnessing it. That, is another topic.
Final thought on athlete selection… Remember that no two blades of grass, even in the same field, ever grow at the same rate. Talent identification is an art, not a science. Our goal is to find a few green bananas in the bunch.